Skip to content
Partner placement Ad · BBZ Poker training

Phil Ivey: The Tiger Woods of Poker

Ten WSOP bracelets, billions in action, and the edge-sorting case that changed poker forever.

The Tournament Record

Ivey's WSOP record speaks for itself:

Year Event Buy-in Prize
2000 $2,500 Pot-Limit Omaha $2,500 $195,000
2002 $1,500 S.H.O.R.S.E. $1,500 $132,000
2002 $2,500 Seven-Card Stud $2,500 $132,000
2002 $2,000 S.H.O.R.S.E. $2,000 $107,540
2005 $5,000 Pot-Limit Omaha $5,000 $635,603
2009 $2,500 No-Limit Deuce-to-Seven Draw $2,500 $96,367
2010 $3,000 H.O.R.S.E. $3,000 $329,840
2013 $1,500 Eight-Game Mix $1,500 $219,792
2014 $1,500 Eight-Game Mix $1,500 $166,986
2014 $10,000 No-Limit Hold'em $10,000 $800,000+

His total live tournament earnings exceed $42 million, placing him consistently in the top 10 all-time.

What separates Ivey from players with comparable or higher lifetime earnings (like Justin Bonomo, Bryn Kenney, or Daniel Negreanu) is the range of formats. Ivey won bracelets in Hold'em, Omaha, Stud, Razz, and mixed games. He is arguably the most versatile poker player who has ever competed at the highest level.


The Cash Games

The tournament results are public. Ivey's legend, however, was built in the cash games, where the numbers are unprovable.

Ivey was a regular in the biggest cash games in the world throughout the 2000s and 2010s:

  • The "Big Game" at the Bellagio, where the minimum buy-in was $100,000 and pots routinely exceeded $1 million
  • Bobby's Room (now "Legends Room") at the Bellagio, a private high-stakes room
  • The highest-stakes online games on Full Tilt Poker before Black Friday (2011), where Ivey played under his own name at stakes up to $500/$1,000

On Full Tilt, Ivey's results are partially trackable through third-party databases. He is estimated to have won between $15-20 million in online cash games before the site closed to US players in 2011. His live cash game results are unknown, but multiple credible sources (including other high-stakes professionals) have described him as one of the biggest winners in live poker history.


The Edge-Sorting Case

In 2012, Phil Ivey and his playing partner Cheung Yin Sun (a professional advantage player) visited the Borgata casino in Atlantic City and the Crockfords Club in London to play Punto Banco, a variant of baccarat.

What Edge Sorting Is

Certain brands of playing cards have asymmetric patterns on their backs. The left edge of the card looks slightly different from the right edge. This manufacturing defect is invisible to most people but detectable to trained observers.

In Punto Banco, certain cards (particularly 6, 7, 8, and 9) are more valuable to identify because they determine key strategic decisions. Ivey and Sun requested that the dealer rotate these specific cards 180 degrees during play, ostensibly as a "superstitious" preference. Once the cards were rotated, they could identify them from the back when they appeared in subsequent shoes.

The Results

At the Borgata, Ivey won approximately $9.6 million over four sessions.

At Crockfords, he won approximately 7.7 million GBP in a single session. Crockfords refused to pay, returning only his original stake.

Both casinos sued. The legal question was whether edge sorting constituted cheating or legitimate advantage play (similar to card counting in blackjack).

Borgata v. Ivey

The New Jersey federal court ruled that Ivey had breached his contract with the casino. He was ordered to return $10.13 million (his winnings plus additional damages).

Crockfords/Genting v. Ivey

The UK Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that edge sorting constituted "cheating" under the Gambling Act 2005, even though Ivey did not tamper with cards or equipment. The ruling established that gaining an unfair advantage through deception (requesting card rotations under false pretenses) meets the legal threshold for cheating in UK gambling law.

The combined financial impact: approximately $20 million in losses and legal fees.

The edge-sorting case reshaped the legal boundary between advantage play and cheating. Card counting remains legal because it uses only publicly available information (the cards dealt face-up). Edge sorting was ruled illegal because it required actively manipulating the casino's equipment (having cards rotated) through deception.

Whether you view Ivey's actions as brilliant advantage play or dishonest manipulation depends largely on where you draw the line between skill and deception in gambling.


The Disappearance and Return

After the edge-sorting lawsuits and their financial consequences, Ivey's public poker presence diminished significantly. He played fewer WSOP events, appeared less in televised cash games, and maintained a lower profile than at any point since 2000.

He has continued to play high-stakes poker privately and has made periodic returns to tournament play. His most recent major public appearances have been at select WSOP and WPT events.

The consensus among high-stakes professionals is that Ivey remains one of the strongest players alive, even if his tournament volume has decreased.


Legacy

Phil Ivey's place in poker history is secure regardless of the edge-sorting controversy. The 10 WSOP bracelets across multiple variants, the dominance in the highest cash games, and the longevity of his career place him in a tier with very few peers.

Ivey may or may not be the single best poker player who ever lived. That claim is unprovable because cash game results are private, because the game evolves, and because peak performance varies by era and format. What is provable is that no player in history demonstrated Ivey's level of excellence across as many variants and formats over as long a period.

The comparison to Tiger Woods, which Ivey himself embraced, is apt in both directions. Both men combined dominance in their game with commercial appeal that reached beyond it, and both saw personal controversies complicate the public narrative. What remains underneath the controversy is the record itself: ten bracelets across multiple variants and two decades in the biggest games in the world.

See how the high-stakes games Ivey plays compare on rake and structure.

Open Rake Calculator

Frequently Asked Questions

How many WSOP bracelets does Phil Ivey have?
Phil Ivey has 10 World Series of Poker bracelets, tied for fifth on the all-time list. His bracelet wins span from 2000 to 2014 across multiple poker variants including No-Limit Hold'em, Pot-Limit Omaha, Seven-Card Stud, and Razz.
What is the Phil Ivey edge-sorting case?
In 2012, Phil Ivey and his associate Cheung Yin Sun used edge sorting (identifying manufacturing defects in playing card patterns) to win approximately $10 million from the Borgata in Atlantic City and the Crockfords Club in London playing Punto Banco (baccarat). Both casinos sued. Borgata won its case and Ivey was ordered to return $10.1 million. The UK Supreme Court ruled against Ivey in 2017, establishing that edge sorting constitutes cheating under UK gambling law.
What is Phil Ivey's net worth?
Estimates vary widely. Ivey's verified tournament earnings exceed $42 million. His cash game results are private but widely believed to be significantly larger. The edge-sorting judgments totaled roughly $20 million in losses. Credible estimates place his current net worth between $50-100 million, though no public verification exists.
Is Phil Ivey the best poker player ever?
Ivey is consistently ranked among the top 3-5 players in history by professionals and media. His case is strongest in terms of versatility: he dominated multiple formats and variants. In pure tournament metrics, players like Justin Bonomo and Bryn Kenney have higher earnings. In cash games, Ivey's reputation is perhaps unmatched, though the private nature of high-stakes cash makes objective comparison impossible.
Poker Room Ad · 18+ · Play responsibly